Tuesday, May 5, 2020

System Engineering Analysis And Development -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The System Engineering Analysis And Development? Answer: Introduction Compatibility is considered to be an essential element in design burner stove. Here the things are arranged in proper manner in order to deal with the issues spatial issues of the stove. The better compatibility within the gas stove is achieved by the arrangements of the hot plates. The congruence design is implemented to get optimized fuel consumption. The article by Hoffmann and Chan (2011), have explored the importance of compatibility and congruence in the respect of spatial arrangement of the four burner gas oven. It is possible to achieve improved levels of spatial relationship with better level of compatibility. The experiment with the article of Hoffmann and Chan, (2011), have used hot plates to mimic the layout of four burner gas oven. With better level of computability and congruence, it is possible to better control the gas oven. From the experiment it has been concluded that it is better to have control over the horizontal direction and control in group that is needed to achieve better levels of computability and congruence. It is also important not to have interposed levels of control as it can compromise of the level of fuel optimization. It is therefore essential to consider the elements of spatial arrangement within the gas burner oven for all future designs. The arrangement of the burners is again optimized to deal with the issues related to that of greater levels of fuel consumption. Human Factors and Ergonomics principles and concepts: According to Wasson (2015), the study of human factors and ergonomics are aimed to achieve better design of products including gadgets and machines. This optimized design is achieved to make the product safe and user friendly. It is also important to analyze the external environment of the machine operations that are needed to improve the levels of safety. It is therefore possible to achieve best possible productivity. In the study of Hoffmann and Chan, (2011), the principles of ergonomics have been achieved to deal with the issues of safety and fuel consumption of in four burner gas oven. The spatial arrangements of the knobs are essential in the context it can help to improve the level of safety. High levels of spatial arrangements that are needed to achieve better level of operating control. Trapezoidal layouts of burners are also effective as it can help to have better levels of control. The added safety advantages are also associated with the given design (Hoffmann Chan, 2011). The designs that are approved by the experiment will now be available in the commercial market to ensure that the public is able to enjoy the best possible gas oven. The validly of the study is due to the fact that it has been reported after conducting experiment with people. It is therefore possible to deal with the issues of spatial relationship between the burner and the knob. This is achieved by having better levels of compatibility and congruence that is achieved with better levels of design. Best possible design The second experiment that has been mentioned in the paper of Hoffmann and Chan (2011), was conducted with seven hot plates, which are arranged in different ways to deal with the issues of spatial organization. The researchers have tired different arrangements of plate that has helped them to evaluate upon the best possible design to improve upon the ergonomic efficiency. The researchers have tried seven different types of combination in the given regards. Two of the designs within the experiment has lower levels of compatibility, thereby causing high level of risks. The first and the sixth design has been found to have the least levels of compatibility. This is mainly for the fact that they have low levels of interposed control. There is also no spatial similarity with the hot plates that were used within the experiment. In order to practically implement the best possible design, it is essential to ensure higher levels of compatibility that will ensure higher level of safety for the users. This believed to be one the essential criteria for the applying the ergonomic principles in design of the gas stove. The length of the linkage is smallest in case of design 2 and 3. This will help to ensure that minimum fuel is being consumed as there is low consumption within the linkages of the pipe. Les expenditure is also required in the manufacture of gas burner using design 2 and 3. Greater amount of space is also available in front of the stove, which will help to improve the safety level. With horizontal level of control, it is easily possible for the user to act swiftly during the time of emergency. Spatial compatibility is also possible within the design, which is evident from the response provided by participants. Hence, from the experiment design 2 and 3 are regarded as the best in terms of usage and compatibility and can be regarded as the most ergonomic design of gas stove. Suggestion for improvement in the HMI design Design 2 and 3 has been chosen as the best possible ergonomic design owing to the fact that they are the best in terms of safety, user friendly and optimized fuel consumption. In order to provide the best possible human-machine interface (HMI) design, it is essential to deal with the issues of emergency situations that can be faced by the user. Hence, in the given context it is important to use easily detachable parts, which can be maintained easily by the users. This will ensure that the safety levels are not compromised (Boy, 2017). The cleaning of the parts also should be done effectively thereby ensuring that there is no blockage within the pipe of fuel flow. This will ensure that there are lower levels of fuel wastages. Hence, with the help of better possible HMI system, it is possible to improve upon the economic efficiency of gas burner stove. Thereby it is possible to optimize the cost with minimum comprised level of safety. References Boy, G. A. (Ed.). (2017). The handbook of human-machine interaction: a human-centered design approach. CRC Press. Hoffmann, E. R., Chan, A. H. (2011). Alternative approaches to the design of four-burner stoves. Ergonomics, 54(9), 777-791. Wasson, C. S. (2015). System engineering analysis, design, and development: Concepts, principles, and practices. John Wiley Sons.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.